Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Ironclad Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Ironclad Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Ironclad Applied Sciences holds $197.0M in lifetime obligations with a 94.2% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

•Ironclad Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $197.0M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B

•Ironclad Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 94.2%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%

•Ironclad Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of Energy

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Ironclad Applied Sciences

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$197.0M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$45.5M

Recompete Win Rate:94.2%

Active Prime Task Orders:33

Average Award Cycle:36 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541714

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B

Recompete Win Rate:93.3%

Active Prime Task Orders:78

Average Award Cycle:39 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512