Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Ironclad Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Ironclad Applied Sciences and THE BOEING COMPANY: Ironclad Applied Sciences holds $197.0M in lifetime obligations with a 94.2% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•Ironclad Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $197.0M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Ironclad Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 94.2%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Ironclad Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of Energy
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Ironclad Applied Sciences
Total Lifetime Obligations:$197.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$45.5M
Recompete Win Rate:94.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:33
Average Award Cycle:36 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541714
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512