Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Ironclad Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Ironclad Applied Sciences and THE BOEING COMPANY: Ironclad Applied Sciences holds $26.6M in lifetime obligations with a 82.2% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Ironclad Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $26.6M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Ironclad Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 82.2%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Ironclad Applied Sciences Top Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Ironclad Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$26.6M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$10.3M
Recompete Win Rate:82.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:15
Average Award Cycle:36 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):518210
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Ironclad Applied Sciences
UEI: FKD7E7BK5M7G • Washington, UT
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA