Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Ironclad Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Ironclad Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Ironclad Applied Sciences holds $410.3M in lifetime obligations with a 93.1% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•Ironclad Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $410.3M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Ironclad Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 93.1%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Ironclad Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Ironclad Applied Sciences
Total Lifetime Obligations:$410.3M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$150.7M
Recompete Win Rate:93.1%
Active Prime Task Orders:79
Average Award Cycle:37 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):332994
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512