Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Ironclad Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Ironclad Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Ironclad Consulting Group holds $36.5M in lifetime obligations with a 88.0% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Ironclad Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $36.5M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Ironclad Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 88.0%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Ironclad Consulting Group Top Agency: Defense Health Agency

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Ironclad Consulting Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$36.5M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$12.0M

Recompete Win Rate:88.0%

Active Prime Task Orders:25

Average Award Cycle:52 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):561612

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512