Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Ironclad Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Ironclad Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Ironclad Consulting Group holds $24.5M in lifetime obligations with a 89.8% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Ironclad Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $24.5M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Ironclad Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 89.8%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Ironclad Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Ironclad Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$24.5M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$5.9M
Recompete Win Rate:89.8%
Active Prime Task Orders:28
Average Award Cycle:50 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):334220
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Ironclad Consulting Group
UEI: HLMT0CJJZPAG • Washington, TN
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA