Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Ironclad Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Ironclad Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Ironclad Consulting Group holds $37.1M in lifetime obligations with a 79.7% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $154.66B with a 93.3% retention rate.
•Ironclad Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $37.1M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $154.66B
•Ironclad Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 79.7%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
•Ironclad Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Air Force
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Ironclad Consulting Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$37.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$11.3M
Recompete Win Rate:79.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:15
Average Award Cycle:49 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541513
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Total Lifetime Obligations:$154.66B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$54.13B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:28
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512