Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Ironclad Defense Systems vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Ironclad Defense Systems and THE BOEING COMPANY: Ironclad Defense Systems holds $40.2M in lifetime obligations with a 95.6% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Ironclad Defense Systems Lifetime Spend: $40.2M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Ironclad Defense Systems Recompete Win %: 95.6%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Ironclad Defense Systems Top Agency: Department of the Army
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Ironclad Defense Systems

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$40.2M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$13.2M
Recompete Win Rate:95.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:6
Average Award Cycle:50 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):332994
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Ironclad Defense Systems vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence