Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Ironclad Global Services vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Ironclad Global Services and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Ironclad Global Services holds $15.6M in lifetime obligations with a 87.3% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

•Ironclad Global Services Lifetime Spend: $15.6M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B

•Ironclad Global Services Recompete Win %: 87.3%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%

•Ironclad Global Services Top Agency: Department of Energy

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Ironclad Global Services

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$15.6M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$5.9M

Recompete Win Rate:87.3%

Active Prime Task Orders:6

Average Award Cycle:44 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541990

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B

Recompete Win Rate:93.3%

Active Prime Task Orders:78

Average Award Cycle:39 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512