Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Ironclad Innovations Inc. vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Ironclad Innovations Inc. and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Ironclad Innovations Inc. holds $19.5M in lifetime obligations with a 78.5% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Ironclad Innovations Inc. Lifetime Spend: $19.5M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Ironclad Innovations Inc. Recompete Win %: 78.5%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Ironclad Innovations Inc. Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Ironclad Innovations Inc.

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$19.5M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$6.6M
Recompete Win Rate:78.5%
Active Prime Task Orders:11
Average Award Cycle:57 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541611
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Ironclad Innovations Inc. vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence