Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Ironclad Security Solutions vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Ironclad Security Solutions and THE BOEING COMPANY: Ironclad Security Solutions holds $44.2M in lifetime obligations with a 83.8% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Ironclad Security Solutions Lifetime Spend: $44.2M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Ironclad Security Solutions Recompete Win %: 83.8%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Ironclad Security Solutions Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Ironclad Security Solutions

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$44.2M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$8.8M
Recompete Win Rate:83.8%
Active Prime Task Orders:18
Average Award Cycle:49 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):332994
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Ironclad Security Solutions
UEI: AYMNLUF2KSYU • Washington, ME
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA