Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Ironclad Solutions Corp vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Ironclad Solutions Corp and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Ironclad Solutions Corp holds $43.6M in lifetime obligations with a 79.1% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Ironclad Solutions Corp Lifetime Spend: $43.6M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Ironclad Solutions Corp Recompete Win %: 79.1%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Ironclad Solutions Corp Top Agency: Department of Energy
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Ironclad Solutions Corp

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$43.6M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$14.6M
Recompete Win Rate:79.1%
Active Prime Task Orders:21
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):336992
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Ironclad Solutions Corp vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence