Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Ironclad Systems Inc. vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Ironclad Systems Inc. and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Ironclad Systems Inc. holds $102.4M in lifetime obligations with a 72.7% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Ironclad Systems Inc. Lifetime Spend: $102.4M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Ironclad Systems Inc. Recompete Win %: 72.7%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Ironclad Systems Inc. Top Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Ironclad Systems Inc.

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$102.4M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$44.9M

Recompete Win Rate:72.7%

Active Prime Task Orders:147

Average Award Cycle:35 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):332993

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512