Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Ironclad Technical Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Ironclad Technical Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Ironclad Technical Services holds $40.8M in lifetime obligations with a 89.4% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Ironclad Technical Services Lifetime Spend: $40.8M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Ironclad Technical Services Recompete Win %: 89.4%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Ironclad Technical Services Top Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Ironclad Technical Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$40.8M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$10.7M
Recompete Win Rate:89.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:12
Average Award Cycle:45 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541330
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Ironclad Technical Services
UEI: R2JPMPKGYM2Y • Washington, FL
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA