Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Ironclad Technical Services vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Ironclad Technical Services and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Ironclad Technical Services holds $615.9M in lifetime obligations with a 74.7% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Ironclad Technical Services Lifetime Spend: $615.9M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Ironclad Technical Services Recompete Win %: 74.7%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Ironclad Technical Services Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Ironclad Technical Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$615.9M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.0M
Recompete Win Rate:74.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:57
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):488310
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Ironclad Technical Services
UEI: J8TNMYEVMYA4 • Washington, MT
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX