Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Ironclad Technical Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Ironclad Technical Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Ironclad Technical Services holds $615.9M in lifetime obligations with a 74.7% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Ironclad Technical Services Lifetime Spend: $615.9M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Ironclad Technical Services Recompete Win %: 74.7%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Ironclad Technical Services Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Ironclad Technical Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$615.9M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.0M
Recompete Win Rate:74.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:57
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):488310
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Ironclad Technical Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence