Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Ironclad Technical Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Ironclad Technical Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Ironclad Technical Services holds $615.9M in lifetime obligations with a 74.7% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Ironclad Technical Services Lifetime Spend: $615.9M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Ironclad Technical Services Recompete Win %: 74.7%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Ironclad Technical Services Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Ironclad Technical Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$615.9M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.0M
Recompete Win Rate:74.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:57
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):488310
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Ironclad Technical Services
UEI: J8TNMYEVMYA4 • Washington, MT
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA