Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Ironclad Technical Services vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Ironclad Technical Services and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Ironclad Technical Services holds $3.0M in lifetime obligations with a 73.9% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

Ironclad Technical Services Lifetime Spend: $3.0M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B
Ironclad Technical Services Recompete Win %: 73.9%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
Ironclad Technical Services Top Agency: Department of Energy
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Ironclad Technical Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$3.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$1.1M
Recompete Win Rate:73.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:16
Average Award Cycle:58 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):334220
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:78
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Ironclad Technical Services vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence