Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Ironclad Technical Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Ironclad Technical Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Ironclad Technical Services holds $5.7M in lifetime obligations with a 82.7% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Ironclad Technical Services Lifetime Spend: $5.7M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Ironclad Technical Services Recompete Win %: 82.7%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Ironclad Technical Services Top Agency: Department of the Army
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Ironclad Technical Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$5.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$1.2M
Recompete Win Rate:82.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:25
Average Award Cycle:40 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):517311
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Ironclad Technical Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence