Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

JOHN SNOW, INCORPORATED vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between JOHN SNOW, INCORPORATED and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: JOHN SNOW, INCORPORATED holds $671.2M in lifetime obligations with a 77.3% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•JOHN SNOW, INCORPORATED Lifetime Spend: $671.2M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•JOHN SNOW, INCORPORATED Recompete Win %: 77.3%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•JOHN SNOW, INCORPORATED Top Agency: Agency for International Development
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

JOHN SNOW, INCORPORATED

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$671.2M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$234.9M
Recompete Win Rate:77.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:3
Average Award Cycle:50 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541690
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
JOHN SNOW, INCORPORATED
UEI: UJEKQ1HZQCW5 • Washington, DC
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX