Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P. vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P. and THE BOEING COMPANY: L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P. holds $3.26B in lifetime obligations with a 92.3% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P. Lifetime Spend: $3.26B
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P. Recompete Win %: 92.3%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P. Top Agency: Department of Defense
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$3.26B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$1.14B
Recompete Win Rate:92.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:14
Average Award Cycle:38 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541330
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.
UEI: DK97RBJXMKF3 • Washington, TX
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA