Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Matrix Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Matrix Applied Sciences and THE BOEING COMPANY: Matrix Applied Sciences holds $11.8M in lifetime obligations with a 87.2% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Matrix Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $11.8M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Matrix Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 87.2%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Matrix Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of Energy
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Matrix Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$11.8M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$5.0M
Recompete Win Rate:87.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:23
Average Award Cycle:51 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561720
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Matrix Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence