Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Matrix Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Matrix Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Matrix Applied Sciences holds $1.10B in lifetime obligations with a 79.7% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Matrix Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $1.10B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Matrix Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 79.7%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Matrix Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Navy
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Matrix Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.10B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$442.7M
Recompete Win Rate:79.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:167
Average Award Cycle:53 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):334419
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Matrix Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence