Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Matrix Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Matrix Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Matrix Applied Sciences holds $1.10B in lifetime obligations with a 79.7% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Matrix Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $1.10B
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•Matrix Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 79.7%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•Matrix Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Navy
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Matrix Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.10B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$442.7M
Recompete Win Rate:79.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:167
Average Award Cycle:53 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):334419
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Matrix Applied Sciences
UEI: H95MZ45FK38J • Washington, NV
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX