Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Matrix Applied Sciences vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Matrix Applied Sciences and THE BOEING COMPANY: Matrix Applied Sciences holds $14.0M in lifetime obligations with a 86.7% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Matrix Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $14.0M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Matrix Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 86.7%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Matrix Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Matrix Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$14.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$4.6M
Recompete Win Rate:86.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:16
Average Award Cycle:36 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541720
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Matrix Applied Sciences
UEI: 5MZ5WQGYB8YA • Washington, MD
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA