Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Matrix Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Matrix Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Matrix Consulting Group holds $808.7M in lifetime obligations with a 88.1% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

Matrix Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $808.7M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
Matrix Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 88.1%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
Matrix Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Matrix Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$808.7M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$341.4M
Recompete Win Rate:88.1%
Active Prime Task Orders:77
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561612
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Matrix Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence