Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Matrix Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Matrix Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Matrix Consulting Group holds $516.3M in lifetime obligations with a 87.0% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

•Matrix Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $516.3M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B

•Matrix Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 87.0%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%

•Matrix Consulting Group Top Agency: Defense Health Agency

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Matrix Consulting Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$516.3M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$127.9M

Recompete Win Rate:87.0%

Active Prime Task Orders:147

Average Award Cycle:45 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):339113

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B

Recompete Win Rate:93.3%

Active Prime Task Orders:78

Average Award Cycle:39 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512