Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Matrix Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Matrix Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: Matrix Consulting Group holds $516.3M in lifetime obligations with a 87.0% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•Matrix Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $516.3M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•Matrix Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 87.0%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•Matrix Consulting Group Top Agency: Defense Health Agency

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Matrix Consulting Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$516.3M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$127.9M

Recompete Win Rate:87.0%

Active Prime Task Orders:147

Average Award Cycle:45 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):339113

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512