Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Matrix Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Matrix Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Matrix Consulting Group holds $516.3M in lifetime obligations with a 87.0% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Matrix Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $516.3M

•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B

•Matrix Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 87.0%

•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%

•Matrix Consulting Group Top Agency: Defense Health Agency

•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Matrix Consulting Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$516.3M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$127.9M

Recompete Win Rate:87.0%

Active Prime Task Orders:147

Average Award Cycle:45 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):339113

Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B

Recompete Win Rate:89.6%

Active Prime Task Orders:221

Average Award Cycle:54 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512