Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Matrix Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Matrix Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: Matrix Consulting Group holds $42.2M in lifetime obligations with a 92.3% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $154.66B with a 93.3% retention rate.

•Matrix Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $42.2M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $154.66B
•Matrix Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 92.3%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%
•Matrix Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Defense
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Matrix Consulting Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$42.2M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$16.4M
Recompete Win Rate:92.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:28
Average Award Cycle:40 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):336611
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$154.66B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$54.13B
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:28
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Matrix Consulting Group
UEI: 4DMLN6NQ41WC • Washington, TN
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
UEI: FYHNA5WC8XD7 • Washington, NM