Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Matrix Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Matrix Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Matrix Engineering Group holds $33.1M in lifetime obligations with a 94.8% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•Matrix Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $33.1M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Matrix Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 94.8%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Matrix Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of the Army
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Matrix Engineering Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$33.1M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$14.0M
Recompete Win Rate:94.8%
Active Prime Task Orders:20
Average Award Cycle:44 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):339113
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512