Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
Matrix Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between Matrix Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: Matrix Engineering Group holds $9.8M in lifetime obligations with a 93.1% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•Matrix Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $9.8M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
•Matrix Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 93.1%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Matrix Engineering Group Top Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →Matrix Engineering Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$9.8M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$3.0M
Recompete Win Rate:93.1%
Active Prime Task Orders:13
Average Award Cycle:37 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541990
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512