Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Matrix Global Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Matrix Global Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Matrix Global Services holds $16.0M in lifetime obligations with a 94.3% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Matrix Global Services Lifetime Spend: $16.0M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Matrix Global Services Recompete Win %: 94.3%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Matrix Global Services Top Agency: Department of Energy
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Matrix Global Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$16.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$4.3M
Recompete Win Rate:94.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:18
Average Award Cycle:58 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541211
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Matrix Global Services
UEI: AV1M5AD3VAAE • Washington, DE
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA