Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Matrix Scientific Corp vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Matrix Scientific Corp and THE BOEING COMPANY: Matrix Scientific Corp holds $1.12B in lifetime obligations with a 87.2% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Matrix Scientific Corp Lifetime Spend: $1.12B
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Matrix Scientific Corp Recompete Win %: 87.2%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Matrix Scientific Corp Top Agency: Department of Defense
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Matrix Scientific Corp

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.12B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$293.1M
Recompete Win Rate:87.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:80
Average Award Cycle:39 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):488310
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Matrix Scientific Corp
UEI: 5J5BS0JXYPHM • Washington, KS
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA