Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Matrix Technical Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Matrix Technical Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Matrix Technical Services holds $8.3M in lifetime obligations with a 78.9% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

Matrix Technical Services Lifetime Spend: $8.3M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
Matrix Technical Services Recompete Win %: 78.9%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
Matrix Technical Services Top Agency: Department of the Treasury
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Matrix Technical Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$8.3M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$2.0M
Recompete Win Rate:78.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:13
Average Award Cycle:51 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541810
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Matrix Technical Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence