Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

Matrix Technical Services vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between Matrix Technical Services and THE BOEING COMPANY: Matrix Technical Services holds $1.04B in lifetime obligations with a 93.3% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•Matrix Technical Services Lifetime Spend: $1.04B
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•Matrix Technical Services Recompete Win %: 93.3%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•Matrix Technical Services Top Agency: Federal Aviation Administration
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

Matrix Technical Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$347.7M
Recompete Win Rate:93.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:82
Average Award Cycle:49 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):334519
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
Matrix Technical Services
UEI: K7USY1XN9D1J • Washington, UT
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA