Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
MELWOOD HORTICULTURAL TRAINING CENTER, INC. vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between MELWOOD HORTICULTURAL TRAINING CENTER, INC. and THE BOEING COMPANY: MELWOOD HORTICULTURAL TRAINING CENTER, INC. holds $95.0M in lifetime obligations with a 80.2% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•MELWOOD HORTICULTURAL TRAINING CENTER, INC. Lifetime Spend: $95.0M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•MELWOOD HORTICULTURAL TRAINING CENTER, INC. Recompete Win %: 80.2%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•MELWOOD HORTICULTURAL TRAINING CENTER, INC. Top Agency: Department of Defense
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →MELWOOD HORTICULTURAL TRAINING CENTER, INC.
Total Lifetime Obligations:$95.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$33.3M
Recompete Win Rate:80.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:1
Average Award Cycle:37 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561210
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512