Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

MissionSupport Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between MissionSupport Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: MissionSupport Applied Sciences holds $1.16B in lifetime obligations with a 75.6% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•MissionSupport Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $1.16B

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•MissionSupport Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 75.6%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•MissionSupport Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Air Force

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

MissionSupport Applied Sciences

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.16B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$409.2M

Recompete Win Rate:75.6%

Active Prime Task Orders:133

Average Award Cycle:37 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):334418

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512