Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

MissionSupport Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between MissionSupport Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: MissionSupport Applied Sciences holds $1.16B in lifetime obligations with a 75.6% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•MissionSupport Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $1.16B
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•MissionSupport Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 75.6%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•MissionSupport Applied Sciences Top Agency: Department of the Air Force
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

MissionSupport Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$1.16B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$409.2M
Recompete Win Rate:75.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:133
Average Award Cycle:37 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):334418
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
MissionSupport Applied Sciences
UEI: QLWQY3CL6QAY • Washington, IL
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX