Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

MissionSupport Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between MissionSupport Applied Sciences and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: MissionSupport Applied Sciences holds $21.2M in lifetime obligations with a 87.3% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

MissionSupport Applied Sciences Lifetime Spend: $21.2M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
MissionSupport Applied Sciences Recompete Win %: 87.3%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
MissionSupport Applied Sciences Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

MissionSupport Applied Sciences

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$21.2M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$7.6M
Recompete Win Rate:87.3%
Active Prime Task Orders:22
Average Award Cycle:50 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541370
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
MissionSupport Applied Sciences vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence