Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

MissionSupport Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between MissionSupport Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP: MissionSupport Consulting Group holds $355.3M in lifetime obligations with a 95.4% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP records $259.14B with a 93.3% retention rate.

•MissionSupport Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $355.3M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Lifetime Spend: $259.14B

•MissionSupport Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 95.4%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Recompete Win %: 93.3%

•MissionSupport Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of the Army

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

MissionSupport Consulting Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$355.3M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$115.4M

Recompete Win Rate:95.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:93

Average Award Cycle:55 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):336611

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$259.14B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$90.70B

Recompete Win Rate:93.3%

Active Prime Task Orders:78

Average Award Cycle:39 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512