Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
MissionSupport Consulting Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between MissionSupport Consulting Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: MissionSupport Consulting Group holds $43.2M in lifetime obligations with a 91.6% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•MissionSupport Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $43.2M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
•MissionSupport Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 91.6%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•MissionSupport Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Energy
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →MissionSupport Consulting Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$43.2M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$9.7M
Recompete Win Rate:91.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:16
Average Award Cycle:46 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):488510
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512