Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

MissionSupport Consulting Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between MissionSupport Consulting Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: MissionSupport Consulting Group holds $68.3M in lifetime obligations with a 77.4% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•MissionSupport Consulting Group Lifetime Spend: $68.3M

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B

•MissionSupport Consulting Group Recompete Win %: 77.4%

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%

•MissionSupport Consulting Group Top Agency: Department of Defense

•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

MissionSupport Consulting Group

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$68.3M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$27.2M

Recompete Win Rate:77.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:139

Average Award Cycle:55 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541380

Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B

Recompete Win Rate:86.4%

Active Prime Task Orders:309

Average Award Cycle:42 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512