Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

MissionSupport Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between MissionSupport Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: MissionSupport Engineering Group holds $40.0M in lifetime obligations with a 91.8% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

MissionSupport Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $40.0M
THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B
MissionSupport Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 91.8%
THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
MissionSupport Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

MissionSupport Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$40.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$10.6M
Recompete Win Rate:91.8%
Active Prime Task Orders:8
Average Award Cycle:53 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561720
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:221
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
MissionSupport Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence