Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

MissionSupport Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between MissionSupport Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: MissionSupport Engineering Group holds $40.0M in lifetime obligations with a 91.8% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•MissionSupport Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $40.0M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•MissionSupport Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 91.8%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•MissionSupport Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

MissionSupport Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$40.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$10.6M
Recompete Win Rate:91.8%
Active Prime Task Orders:8
Average Award Cycle:53 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):561720
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
MissionSupport Engineering Group
UEI: 3GT33UMN5GD0 • Washington, AR
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA