Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
MissionSupport Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between MissionSupport Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: MissionSupport Engineering Group holds $558.3M in lifetime obligations with a 83.2% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.
•MissionSupport Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $558.3M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
•MissionSupport Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 83.2%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•MissionSupport Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of the Air Force
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →MissionSupport Engineering Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$558.3M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$163.7M
Recompete Win Rate:83.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:66
Average Award Cycle:41 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541990
Entity B
Full Profile →LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512