Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
MissionSupport Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between MissionSupport Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: MissionSupport Engineering Group holds $558.3M in lifetime obligations with a 83.2% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•MissionSupport Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $558.3M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•MissionSupport Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 83.2%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•MissionSupport Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of the Air Force
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →MissionSupport Engineering Group
Total Lifetime Obligations:$558.3M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$163.7M
Recompete Win Rate:83.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:66
Average Award Cycle:41 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541990
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512