Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

MissionSupport Engineering Group vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between MissionSupport Engineering Group and THE BOEING COMPANY: MissionSupport Engineering Group holds $429.2M in lifetime obligations with a 86.9% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•MissionSupport Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $429.2M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•MissionSupport Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 86.9%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•MissionSupport Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of Defense
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

MissionSupport Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$429.2M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$192.4M
Recompete Win Rate:86.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:75
Average Award Cycle:32 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541370
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
MissionSupport Engineering Group
UEI: KYW3UX6ZQCEG • Washington, NM
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA