Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

MissionSupport Engineering Group vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between MissionSupport Engineering Group and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: MissionSupport Engineering Group holds $45.0M in lifetime obligations with a 95.7% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $394.04B with a 86.4% retention rate.

•MissionSupport Engineering Group Lifetime Spend: $45.0M
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $394.04B
•MissionSupport Engineering Group Recompete Win %: 95.7%
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
•MissionSupport Engineering Group Top Agency: Department of Defense
•LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

MissionSupport Engineering Group

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$45.0M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$10.5M
Recompete Win Rate:95.7%
Active Prime Task Orders:26
Average Award Cycle:37 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):562910
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$394.04B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$137.91B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:91
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
MissionSupport Engineering Group
UEI: WWH7ZLC1U6N2 • McLean, VA
VS
Prime Contractor B
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
UEI: G4KDGE4JFFK7 • Washington, TX