Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

MissionSupport Global Services vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between MissionSupport Global Services and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION: MissionSupport Global Services holds $25.2M in lifetime obligations with a 84.2% recompete retention rate, while LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION records $719.47B with a 86.4% retention rate.

MissionSupport Global Services Lifetime Spend: $25.2M
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $719.47B
MissionSupport Global Services Recompete Win %: 84.2%
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 86.4%
MissionSupport Global Services Top Agency: Department of Energy
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

MissionSupport Global Services

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$25.2M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$8.0M
Recompete Win Rate:84.2%
Active Prime Task Orders:24
Average Award Cycle:59 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541370
Entity B

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$719.47B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$251.82B
Recompete Win Rate:86.4%
Active Prime Task Orders:309
Average Award Cycle:42 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
MissionSupport Global Services vs. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION - Federal Contracting Win Rates & Spend Comparison | GovMatrix Intelligence