Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

MissionSupport Scientific Corp vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between MissionSupport Scientific Corp and THE BOEING COMPANY: MissionSupport Scientific Corp holds $43.3M in lifetime obligations with a 77.9% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•MissionSupport Scientific Corp Lifetime Spend: $43.3M
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•MissionSupport Scientific Corp Recompete Win %: 77.9%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•MissionSupport Scientific Corp Top Agency: Defense Health Agency
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

MissionSupport Scientific Corp

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$43.3M
Trailing 12M Obligations:$10.4M
Recompete Win Rate:77.9%
Active Prime Task Orders:4
Average Award Cycle:43 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541690
Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Custom Matchup Builder

Compare Any Two Federal Contractors Side-by-Side

8,499+ SAM.gov prime contractors indexed
Prime Contractor A
MissionSupport Scientific Corp
UEI: NVV5H643JBE3 • Washington, IN
VS
Prime Contractor B
THE BOEING COMPANY
UEI: WZWRLY4G3PL8 • Washington, WA