Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION vs. SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION and SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION: NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION holds $125.27B in lifetime obligations with a 82.6% recompete retention rate, while SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION records $114.88B with a 85.6% retention rate.
•NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $125.27B
•SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $114.88B
•NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 82.6%
•SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 85.6%
•NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
•SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$125.27B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$43.85B
Recompete Win Rate:82.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:134
Average Award Cycle:41 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Entity B
Full Profile →SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$114.88B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$40.21B
Recompete Win Rate:85.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:28
Average Award Cycle:58 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512