Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION vs. THE BOEING COMPANY
Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.
Comparison Highlights
Verified SAM.gov & FPDS DataComparing federal prime contracting performance between NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION and THE BOEING COMPANY: NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION holds $61.72B in lifetime obligations with a 82.6% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $254.75B with a 89.6% retention rate.
•NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION Lifetime Spend: $61.72B
•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $254.75B
•NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION Recompete Win %: 82.6%
•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%
•NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION Top Agency: Department of Defense
•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense
Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side
Entity A
Full Profile →NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Total Lifetime Obligations:$61.72B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$21.60B
Recompete Win Rate:82.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:21
Average Award Cycle:41 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512
Entity B
Full Profile →THE BOEING COMPANY
Total Lifetime Obligations:$254.75B
Trailing 12M Obligations:$89.16B
Recompete Win Rate:89.6%
Active Prime Task Orders:53
Average Award Cycle:54 Days
Primary Industry (NAICS):541512