Prime Contractor Head-to-Head Analysis

NORTHROP GRUMMAN TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. vs. THE BOEING COMPANY

Comparative federal market share, recompete retention probability, agency obligations, and socioeconomic classifications.

Comparison Highlights

Verified SAM.gov & FPDS Data

Comparing federal prime contracting performance between NORTHROP GRUMMAN TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. and THE BOEING COMPANY: NORTHROP GRUMMAN TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. holds $750.9M in lifetime obligations with a 93.3% recompete retention rate, while THE BOEING COMPANY records $478.32B with a 89.6% retention rate.

•NORTHROP GRUMMAN TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. Lifetime Spend: $750.9M

•THE BOEING COMPANY Lifetime Spend: $478.32B

•NORTHROP GRUMMAN TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. Recompete Win %: 93.3%

•THE BOEING COMPANY Recompete Win %: 89.6%

•NORTHROP GRUMMAN TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. Top Agency: Department of Defense

•THE BOEING COMPANY Top Agency: Department of Defense

Core Procurement Metrics Side-by-Side

Entity A

NORTHROP GRUMMAN TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$750.9M

Trailing 12M Obligations:$262.8M

Recompete Win Rate:93.3%

Active Prime Task Orders:2

Average Award Cycle:37 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541330

Entity B

THE BOEING COMPANY

Full Profile →

Total Lifetime Obligations:$478.32B

Trailing 12M Obligations:$167.41B

Recompete Win Rate:89.6%

Active Prime Task Orders:221

Average Award Cycle:54 Days

Primary Industry (NAICS):541512